The Death of the Information Superhighway
By Richard Wiggins
ast
week President Clinton held a press conference in which he dramatically announced
his plans to do nothing. The topic was the Internet. The President said that
Internet commerce was an important national and international goal, and that the
best way to promote that commerce was for government to step aside and for the
industry to police itself.
Ira Magaziner, who crafted the Clinton health plan, contrived the new
policy. On the heels of the overturn of the Communications Decency Act,
the architect of a gargantuan, enormously complex scheme for fixing the
health care industry has concluded that the best way to promote the Internet
industry is to leave it alone.
The CDA set up Federal prosecutors and courts as referees of Internet content.
Regardless of past views, at this point the Administration is on the right track
with its laissez faire treatment of the Internet. In some ways Clinton is merely
describing the inevitable. During the 1996 campaign, some opponents claimed that
Clinton tried wherever possible to take credit for the sunrise. Now comes the
President with a bold plan: don't do anything that will impede the development
of new Internet technologies. If you can't claim credit for the sunrise, take
credit for not slowing the rotation of the Earth.
What alternatives might the Adminstration have entertained? Regulating content?
No, the Supreme Court pretty clearly took the wind out of those sails. Creating a
new Cabinet post, the Secretary of Internet Commerce? No, a Congress that wants to
dismantle the existing Commerce Department wouldn't favor any sort of new bureacracy.
Taxing the Net? No, that would've evoked a horrendous hue and cry from the
telecommunications industry, consumers, and advocates of free trade.
|