![]()
|
|
||
| Volume 1, Number 23 | May 14, 1998 | home / experts / internet |
|
|
||
East Lansing, Michigan
|
| D |
ear Ms. Reno:
You’ve carefully built a reputation for independence. You say you make all your decisions on the law and the facts. You and your staff probably uncovered some real strongarm tactics in the way Microsoft forced manufacturers to ship Internet Explorer on new Windows 95 systems. So, you went to court to fight that practice as monopolistic.
Now, you've extended that battle to new turf: the issue of Windows 98 including integrated Web browser functionality. In so doing, you're impeding the natural evolution of computer systems. Today, we think of a computer operating system with an integrated Web browser as a novel idea. In five years, every cash register and gasoline pump will be doing transactions over the Internet, and every television and telephone will have integrated Web browsers. We will look back and recall how quaint the world was when operating systems and Web browsers were thought of as separate products.
To be sure, there are very real issues surrounding Microsoft and the markets in which it does business:
These issues involve the entire computer industry, and the economy as a whole. But if Justice is really concerned about its antitrust duties, it should have begun investigating these these issues years ago. It may be too late to undo the concentration in many of these areas. Or, you may be forced to split Microsoft up.
Nonetheless, the very real issues surrounding Microsoft’s monopoly powers predate the Web, and you now seek to nail all of these issues upon the cross of the browser market. In essence, you want Microsoft to pay for all of its sins, real and alleged, by stifling an inevitable innovation in the history of computing.
The operating-system-as-browser issue should not be viewed as a part of your overall analysis of alleged monopolistic practices. The question is not whether Microsoft should be allowed to integrate browser functions into the operating system; it’s why we don’t have more viable operating systems on the market, whose vendors would be free to make the same innovation.
Ask yourself this: if you prevent Microsoft from adding browser functionality to Windows, will you apply that same proscription to Apple, Sun, and others? Surely not, and for good reason. Microsoft integrated TCP/IP into Windows 95, which certainly affected the market for products of FTP Software and other companies. Yet no one cried "foul," because Windows was merely catching up to Unix, which always had TCP/IP built in. Now, Microsoft is taking the next logical step, integrating the Web into Windows 98. While this may be injurious to Netscape, it also will open many new avenues of efficiency and innovation for other companies.
Sincerely,
Richard Wiggins
www.webreference.com/outlook
Comments are welcome
Produced by Rich Wiggins and
All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices.
Created: May 14, 1998
Revised: May 14, 1998
URL: http://webreference.com/outlook/column23/