| |
So, you may see from this example how drastic a difference in perception
may ensue from the combination of the two factors that we're analysing.
The right composition, with its asymmetric balance and obvious pursuit
for perfection, is very expressive, perhaps even to the point of being a
bit ostentatious and strained. This image's appeal is more powerful and
immediate, although it also has a number of nuances that are only
obvious to an attentive eye.
The left image is, at the first glance, not so complicated visually,
although I'd say that it may require a more educated and insightful
perception. This composition tries to achieve the same goals of balance
and perfection, but the deceptive looseness and even deliberate
awkwardness of its outlines makes it more difficult to evaluate the
results. If we try to identify possible historical prototypes, the left
image may remind you of Picasso drawings, while the right one is not
unlike some mannered Art Nouveau decorative compositions or Aubrey
Beardsley's book illustrations.
These images can exemplify another aspect of compositions with Bezier
curves. Examining the right composition as a whole, we can see that
curvature, besides defining the shape of the line, carries some
visual weight that should be accounted for when analyzing the
balance relations in the composition. Indeed, the sharper a line is bent
at some point, the longer it takes a viewer to figure out the shape of
that line fragment, and therefore, the greater is the visual importance
that we subconsciously attach to that part of the image.
For instance, in the right composition above, the concentration of
features in the top right corner counterbalances the less populated
center and bottom areas of the rectangle, which occupy a larger space
but are not so rich in curvature extremities. From this viewpoint, the
left composition is much more homogeneous, with its curvature
distributed more or less evenly over the available space. |
|